Chess Composers
Whose birthday is it today?
Friday, February 2, 2024
Award of Crisan-50 JT
The announcement of the Crisan-50 JT was published in Quartz-56 (page 943).
The full uncensored award can be downloaded here.
Thursday, January 9, 2020
5 draw pendulums in Retractor
The draw pendulum is a retro specific element used in retractor problems. Based on the three fold repetition of the same position, White can force Black to retract a weak move instead of a strong move. In order to achieve this objective, the critical position must be obtained after Black’s retraction, then White can start the pendulum.
The draw pendulum theme fascinated many composers, who found several ways of expressing it, such as the short form (the so-called amputated draw pendulum), exploiting the losing of castling rights / en passant capture or zugzwang motivated. One major challenge was to show the theme in a five fold presentation – the topic of this post. (Definitions at the end of the article)
Michel Caillaud was the first composer to achieve 5 draw pendulums.
Let’s study together his magnificent composition (H25 from the FIDE Album 2013-2015):
Show Solution -1. Kb2-b1 Bf8-g7+ -2.Rb1:Ba1 a2-a1=B+ (1st occurrence) -3.Ka3-b2 Bg7-f8+ -4.Kb2-a3 Bf8-g7+ (2nd occurrence) -5.Ka3-b2 Bg7-f8+ -6.Kb2-a3 Kd4-d3+ (forced – 1st draw pendulum) -7.Kc2-b2 Bh5-g6+ -8.Rb2:Qb1 Qa1-b1+ (1st occurrence) -9.Kd1-c2 Bg6-h5+ -10.Kc2-d1 Bh5-g6+ (2nd occurrence) -11.Kd1-c2 Bg6-h5+ -12.Kc2-d1 Ke4-d4+ (forced – 2nd draw pendulum) -13.Kc3-c2 Bf8-g7+ -14.Rc2-b2 Qb1-a1+ (1st occurrence) -15.Kb4-c3 Bg7-f8+ -16.Kc3-b4 Bf8-g7+ (2nd occurrence) -17.Kb4-c3 Bg7-f8+ -18.Kc3-b4 Ke5-e4+ (forced – 3rd draw pendulum) -19.Kd3-c3 Bh5-g6+ -20.Rb2-c2 Qa1-b1+ (1st occurrence) -21.Ke2-d3 Bg6-h5+ -22.Kd3-e2 Bh5-g6+ (2nd occurrence) -23.Ke2-d3 Bg6-h5+ -24.Kd3-e2 Kf5-e5+ (forced – 4th draw pendulum) -25.Kd4-d3 Bf8-g7+ -26.Re2-b2 Qb1-a1+ (1st occurrence) -27.Kc5-d4 Bg7-f8+ -28.Kd4-c5 Bf8-g7+ (2nd occurrence) -29. Kc5-d4 Bg7-f8+ -30.Kd4-c5 Kf6-f5+ (forced – 5th draw pendulum) -31.Re5-e2 & 1.Bg5# |
Thursday, July 25, 2019
Changed mates after same defenses in three-movers
Changed mates have been considered one of the most exquisite artistic expressions in two-movers. The reader may find an excellent presentation of two-movers with changed mates in this OzProblem article by Peter Wong: Zagoruiko.
Naturally, chess composers tried to express this idea in longer problems as well. The first successful rendering of the idea dates back in the 19th century, when Stanislav Trčala published the following composition:
Here there are even three changed mates after Black defenses 1… Ke5 and 1… Kc5.
Of course, White continuations are checking and some mates are model, according to Bohemian school principles.
A slight blemish is the triple mate in the threat, although the quiet second move is highly enjoyable.
Naturally, chess composers tried to express this idea in longer problems as well. The first successful rendering of the idea dates back in the 19th century, when Stanislav Trčala published the following composition:
Show Solution 1.♖b4! (2.♖b5 ~ 3.♕d7/♕c7/♖d5#) 1...♖f3 2.♕d7+ 2...♔e5 3.♕×d4# 1...♖e3 2.♖×d4+ 2...♔c5 3.♘e6# 2...♔e5 3.♕g7# 1...a6 2.♖b6+ 2...♔c5 3.♕d5# 2...♔e5 3.♘g6# 2...♔c5 3.♕c6# |
Here there are even three changed mates after Black defenses 1… Ke5 and 1… Kc5.
Of course, White continuations are checking and some mates are model, according to Bohemian school principles.
A slight blemish is the triple mate in the threat, although the quiet second move is highly enjoyable.
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Valladao theme in Proca Retractor
The Valladao task (thus named after Joaquim Valladão Monteiro) is a mix of the three special moves: castling, en passant capture and [minor] promotion, in a single chess problem. Naturally, this blend has attracted many chess composers and the retro genre makes no exception.
In the selected four Proca Retractor compositions the thematic moves appear in the retro play. Interested readers may find other examples in which the castling or the promotion appear in the forward play. (To find them, go to PDB website and search "k='valladao' and stip='proca'")
As usual in Proca Retractors, the main challenge is to ensure there are no duals in the retro or forward play.
The below 1st Prize winner would demonstrate many specific points:
More difficult is to show the retraction of the white castling. The only convincing example so far has been realized by the regretted German expert Wolfgang Dittmann and it is also the first one to show the s#1 stipulation in the forward play.
The above examples showed Valladao using AntiCirce. It is also possible to mix Proca Retractor with other fairy conditions, as in the next example.
Definitions:
Proca Retractor definition:
A Proca Retractor is a defensive Retractor. Black is defending by trying to retract the moves that will forbid (or delay) the achievement of White's goal. You may see at the Retro Corner an example by W. Dittmann of orthodox Proca Retractor showing two en passant captures.
Anticirce: the capturing piece disappears and is immediately reborn on its home square while the captured piece is removed for good. The capture is not legal if the rebirth square is not free. A pawn capturing on the eighth rank is first promoted and then reborn on the home square of the promoted man. Here "checks are fairy" i.e. a King is not in check if its "capture" is not legal because the rebirth is not possible.
In AntiCirce Cheylan a piece is not allowed to capture on its home square; in AntiCirce Calvet this is allowed.
Circe Assassin: the captured unit is reborn on its rebirth square even if the rebirth square is occupied. And then the occupying unit disappears for good. Hence a unit on its home square cannot be removed.
In the selected four Proca Retractor compositions the thematic moves appear in the retro play. Interested readers may find other examples in which the castling or the promotion appear in the forward play. (To find them, go to PDB website and search "k='valladao' and stip='proca'")
As usual in Proca Retractors, the main challenge is to ensure there are no duals in the retro or forward play.
The below 1st Prize winner would demonstrate many specific points:
Show Solution 1.g5xh6 ep.(+wPh2) h7-h5 2.Bg8xRa2(+wBf1) Ra1-a2+ 3.d5xc6 ep.(+wPc2) c7-c5 4.Kc2-b2 Kc8-d8+ 5.Kd1-c2 Ra2-a1+ 6.Ke1-d1 Rd8-e8+ 7.Kc1xpb2(+wKe1) b3-b2+ 8.Kd2-c1 Ra1-a2+ 9.Ke1-d2 Ra2-a1+ 10.Ke6xRe5(+wKe1) 0-0-0+ 11.g7-g8=B & 1.Bd5# The order of moves is very precise. White can’t play directly 1.Bg8xRa2(+wBf1)? because Black can play 1...Qh8-h4+! hence the en passant key, obstructing the black Queen. The second en passant capture is required to free square c2 for the white King and constrain the black Rook e5 on the same file. Black castling is forced as a result of bRe5 checking wKe6. There is no promotion dual in the forward play, as 1.g8=R? is thwarted by 1...Qh1! White can’t proceed earlier with the main plan 7.Ke6xRe5(+wKe1) because in the forward play there is no mate: 1.g8=Q? Bd1! The three-move preparatory plan will add the needed black plug on b3. Finally, the "No Forward Defense" specification is needed against 5...Ra2-a1+ & 1...Re1# An excellent composition, full of subtle motivations. |
Show Solution 1.Kg2-h1 f4-f3+ 2.a5xb6 ep.(+wPb2) b7-b5 3.Kf1-g2 Rd8-d1+ 4.Ke1-f1 f3-f2+ 5.Kd1xRc1(+wKe1) 0-0-0+ 6.g7xSh8=S(+wSg1) & 1.g8=R# In the initial position White is already under the threat of the forward defense 1...Qh7#, which explains the non-specific key. The en passant capture has again a multiple purpose: it interferes with bBc6 on its way to a8, preventively obstructs bRa8 from delivering the forward defense 1...Ra2# after the castling and blocks the flight b7 with a black pawn. Only a bS can be uncaptured on h8, because a bB would be able to parry the mate in the forward play with 1...Bxe5 [+bBf8]. Another splendid conception! |
More difficult is to show the retraction of the white castling. The only convincing example so far has been realized by the regretted German expert Wolfgang Dittmann and it is also the first one to show the s#1 stipulation in the forward play.
Show Solution 1.Kc1-d2 a2-a1=S 2.0-0-0+ a3-a2 3.c5xb6 ep.(+wPb2) b7-b5 4.Kc8xRd7(+wKe1) & 1.Re1+ Rxg4(+bRa8)# All the play is centered around zugzwang. The key forces unpromotion by means of stalemate, as after 1...Sc2-a1 there is no legal retraction for White. The purpose of the white castling is to specifically block a1 parrying the black King check. Decapturing en passant with 3.a5xb6 ep.(+wPb2) is not possible because of the doubled pawns on file 'a' wPa5-bPa2, a setting that is illegal in AntiCirce. The purpose of the en passant capture is again to block the future flight b7. Of course, in the forward play neither bB nor bK can capture wRg4, as c8 is blocked by the wK and e8 guarded by wR. |
The above examples showed Valladao using AntiCirce. It is also possible to mix Proca Retractor with other fairy conditions, as in the next example.
Show Solution 1.g5xf6 ep.(+bPf7) f7-f5 2.Sd3xRb4(+bRh8,-bBh8) Rd4-b4+ 3.Ka2xpb2(+bPb7) Rd8-d4+ 4.Kb1xSa2(bSg8,-wSg8) 0-0-0+ 5.g7-g8=S b3-b2 6.Sb2xRd1(+bRa8,-bQa8) d2-d1=R+ 7.Rf3xpf7(+bPf7,-wRf7) & 1.Re3+ Qe4# The thematic key opens both the diagonal h8-b2 and the line f3-f7. When wK stands on a2, bR may not attack any white pawn standing on the 'a' file and is forced to retreat to d8. Black castling is forced thanks to a double check delivered by bR on both wSd3 and wSg8. A similar motive appears later forcing the promotion of the bR. However, the most interesting point in the solution is the surprising zugzwang appearing after the white promotion, with bR and bK not able to move as they have just castled and bSa2 being specifically tied up. Although being passive throughout the whole retro play, the wQ specifically guards the flights d7 and d8 during the forward play, while the bQ delivers the mate and specifically guards a1. |
Definitions:
Proca Retractor definition:
A Proca Retractor is a defensive Retractor. Black is defending by trying to retract the moves that will forbid (or delay) the achievement of White's goal. You may see at the Retro Corner an example by W. Dittmann of orthodox Proca Retractor showing two en passant captures.
Anticirce: the capturing piece disappears and is immediately reborn on its home square while the captured piece is removed for good. The capture is not legal if the rebirth square is not free. A pawn capturing on the eighth rank is first promoted and then reborn on the home square of the promoted man. Here "checks are fairy" i.e. a King is not in check if its "capture" is not legal because the rebirth is not possible.
In AntiCirce Cheylan a piece is not allowed to capture on its home square; in AntiCirce Calvet this is allowed.
Circe Assassin: the captured unit is reborn on its rebirth square even if the rebirth square is occupied. And then the occupying unit disappears for good. Hence a unit on its home square cannot be removed.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
White & Black double en passant capture in Proca Retractor
The en passant capture is, together with castling and promotion, one of the three special moves in chess. The special character of the en passant capture is underlined by the fact that the arrival square is not occupied by the captured piece – an effect which can be also met in fairy chess compositions.
In Proca Retractor compositions the main challenge is to find good motivations in order to force Black to retract the en passant capture. This challenging theme can be realized combined with different fairy conditions.
Proca Retractor definition:
A Proca Retractor is a defensive Retractor. Black is defending by trying to retract the moves that will forbid (or delay) the achievement of White's goal. You may see at the Retro Corner an example by W. Dittmann of orthodox Proca Retractor showing two en passant captures.
The first composer who successfully showed the Black and White double en passant capture was Dr. Klaus Wenda. In the first two problems we can see how he managed to present this theme combined with Madrasi and AntiCirce Cheylan.
In Proca Retractor compositions the main challenge is to find good motivations in order to force Black to retract the en passant capture. This challenging theme can be realized combined with different fairy conditions.
Proca Retractor definition:
A Proca Retractor is a defensive Retractor. Black is defending by trying to retract the moves that will forbid (or delay) the achievement of White's goal. You may see at the Retro Corner an example by W. Dittmann of orthodox Proca Retractor showing two en passant captures.
The first composer who successfully showed the Black and White double en passant capture was Dr. Klaus Wenda. In the first two problems we can see how he managed to present this theme combined with Madrasi and AntiCirce Cheylan.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
A lucky piece arrangement?
This post is dedicated to an interesting piece arrangement involving white King, Rook, Bishop and Knight(s) and black King in helpmate in 3.
Five years ago, with the occasion of the Chess Olympiad in Dresden 2008, a quick composing tourney with two sections was organized. The required theme in the tourney was:
One year later, the same piece arrangement leaded to another success in a different tournament:
Five years ago, with the occasion of the Chess Olympiad in Dresden 2008, a quick composing tourney with two sections was organized. The required theme in the tourney was:
In a h#3 White pins (after a checkless key) his own piece on its first move. The pinned piece delivers check mate.
Show Solution A: 1.Bd5 Bxf2 2.Sf4 Bxe3 3.Qd7 Bc5# B: 1.Rd5 Rxe2 2.Sd3 Rxe3 3.Qc7 Re6# The judge Udo Degener praised the construction hoping that no anticipation will be found. The whole play is based on the destruction of two black batteries unpinning the thematic white pieces and black Grimshaw. The black Queen performs a selfblock while unguarding the mating square. [Award of the Dresden 2008 QCT] |
One year later, the same piece arrangement leaded to another success in a different tournament:
Friday, January 11, 2013
Loshinsky 100 - about a "Loshinsky-magnet" problem
On the occasion of Lev Loshinsky's coming centenary (Jan.17th), it may be profitable and instructive to return to a problem by Lev Loshinsky which was mentioned on this blog. In fact, the problem quoted there was a version of Lev Loshinsky's magnet masterpiece.
In 1947, Loshinsky published his first prizewinner showing the magnet theme:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)